When my history class was assigned to read two chapters from
Nathaniel Philbrick’s historical novel Mayflower (The two chapters being The Heart of Winter and In a
Dark and Dismal Swamp), I was not sure if I would like, appreciate, or even
understand the reading. We were assigned several pages each night over the
course of three nights, with a literature circle discussing the reading on the
Friday of the week in class.
Throughout
the course of the week, as I was reading the chapters, I was not sure if I
enjoyed the book. I recognized that Philbrick was a very effective storyteller,
in that he told the tale of the Pilgrims in a manner which makes the reading
seem more like fiction than truth. I don’t know why I didn’t like the reading
then, perhaps it had to do with the almost tedious amount of detail that the
author put in to explain even the most trivial things, for example Samoset’s
approach to the colony from the hill. However, now that the reading has been
completed and discussed in class with others, I have had a chance to think about
what I read. I understand now that the author went to great extents to make the
story very exciting, and effectively did so. I realize that I do in fact like
to learn about the first settlers of Massachusetts, as they were the ones who
built the foundation of the country that we know today. I
think that the key topics which need to be understood when reading this book
are those involving death and hardship surrounding the settlers. Once you
understand why this is such a focus (it was more than just a problem, it was
the pilgrims’ lifestyle) you will be able to appreciate why the author spent so
much time talking about it. Overall, I think everyone capable of feeling
empathy for people who lived in a different time should have a go at Mayflower. The only thing to remember is
that the author doesn’t just discuss death because he feels like it.
No comments:
Post a Comment